![]() You don't have to use the Scanner Software (SilverFast, Epson, or VueScan) to process the image. The trick with silverfast is to find the optimum workflow for each film type. The IR channel in silverfast also works better than digital ice since it is not performed by software, but occupies a separate channel and is scanned a second time. Silverfast gives more tools to do so than Epsonscan. The more you manipulate your image in 48 bit color and 16 bit b+w, as opposed to 16 bit color and 8bit b+w the less tonal destruction you will have once imported into your image editor. The learning curve is long on Silverfast, but it does better scans. I haven't found Epson Scan a problem so far. Perhaps I should stick to Epson Scan for the time being, and see how I get on, and then try the trial version of Silverfast as Scanzzz suggested. I daresay I need to go on my own learning curve, but your tips will be useful. I don't like how it detects and takes care of dust, etc.). I wasted a whole lot of time in the beginning of my scanner learning curve trying to get silverfast to work as advertised and I never liked any of the results (i.e. MINOR adjustments) and take care of dust in post production software. I've had the best results with the software that came with the scanner (Epson Scan) with all the bells and whistles turned off (including USM), and minor adjustment of curves, histogram, and the gray-dropper for color (and it took me awhile to learn not to over do it with these things, i.e. I'm a little bit lazy so I stayed with Epson Scan in Professional Mode. But for color negative film, you should get more consistent color from SF Pro version like my friend did. The learning curve for SilverFast is quite steep at least for me, so you might want to give it a bit more time to try it out before giving up.įor color slides and B&W, I would dare say there is not a lot of reason to go for SF Pro version. You cannot depend on others to tell you if one workflow is better for your particular tastes. I am wondering if it is worth buying Silverfast, although I suspect it may depend on what I want to do.ĭownload the free trial version and test for yourself. However, I have been using Elements 3 & 4 for my DVD project and it is very good but limited for the professional user.Įpson have catered well for the film user with four holders and a flexible 10x8 film area guide (for those with odd shape film).Can anyone give me the benefit of their experience and tell me what the benefits of using Silverfast rather than Epson Scan would be, assuming there are some. Given that this scanner is aimed at the professional user I am rather surprised that this entry level application is included. Photoshop Elements 3 is included for both Windows and Macintosh. A Quick Start guide is ideal for those who do not want to wade through the electronic manual. The V750 includes the full version, which is a much better option. SilverFast 6 (SE - Special Edition) is included, SE means that the full functionality of the software is not available - your not really getting anything special. A USB 2.0 Hi-Speed cable is included - I always find it rather odd that scanners are supplied with this cable, yet you have to purchase one for printers. A separate power cable is included, I would presume that would be changed for different countries. Given the size of the scanner 503mm x 308mm x 152.5mm (19.8 x 12.1 x 6.0 inches) I am surprised that the AC adapter has not been incorporated into the actual scanner body. I am splitting the contents up into two shots, the first above is a shot of the scanner and software. Lets take a close look at the Epson Perfection V700 Photo scanner. High end film scanners are now rare items so flatbed scanners would seem to be the most logical and affordable choice. Having said that, there are many photographers who still want to convert their slide and film collections into digital files. Most photographers are now shooting digitally, so film scanning is not a high priority. Both scanners produced high quality scans that were close, if not better than most dedicated film scanners. It seems like this is becoming an annual event, a year ago I reviewed the Epson 4990 scanner, the year before it was the 4870.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |